Legal Opinion

State v. Alowonle

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1984No. CO-84-475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

This appeal is from a jury verdict finding appellant Falilu Alowonle guilty of two counts of assault in violation of Minneapolis City Ordinance § 385.190 (1982), and two counts of disorderly conduct in violation of Minneapolis City Ordinance § 385.-90 (1982). Appellant claims the trial court improperly prevented him from introducing an exculpatory photograph and erred in its instructions by directing a verdict oh assault. He also contends the prosecutor committed misconduct in final summation and that the evidence was insufficient to convict. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. State v. EllingsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. State v. HeinzerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. State v. SchafferCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API