Legal Opinion

Franklin-Mason v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 30, 2016No. 09-640Published

1Opinion of the Court

28 U.S.C. § 1491, (Tucker Act Jurisdiction); Rule 56 of the United States Court of Federal Claims, (Summary Judgment).

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND FINAL ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING THE GOVERNMENT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BRADEN, Judge.

I. RELEVANT FACTUAL BACK-

GROUND. 1

A. Plaintiffs Initial Employment With The United States Department Of The Navy.

In 1978, Roxann Franklin Mason was hired as a General Schedule (“GS”) 5 employee in the United States Department of the Navy (“Navy 5 ’), as a Statistical Assistant in the Office of the Comptroller,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API