Legal Opinion
Lokes v. Kondrotas
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
This action was brought by a complaint based on a note in these terms:
“$950.00 ' Waterbury, Conn., Jul. 19, 1923.
Two weeks after date I promise to pay to the order of Joseph Lokes nine hundred fifty and 00/100 dollars, payable at office of Ch. Kazemekas’ Banking House. Value received.”'
The defendant pleaded by way of answer, that the consideration for the note was the purchase price of a saloon business owned and conducted by the plaintiff, together with a stock of intoxicating liquors therein, which were on the day of sale being sold contrary to law. These allegations the plaintiff denied.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Funk v. GallivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
- State v. MoriartySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Foley v. Huntington Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Iseli Co. v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Canton Motorcar Works, Inc. v. DiMartinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Vaszauskas v. VaszauskasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932