Legal Opinion

Rook v. . Horton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 30, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYarser, J.

Plaintiff’s exceptions challenge tbe rulings of tbe trial court in bolding that adverse possession under color of title for a period of seven years was sufficient to bar tbe petitioner’s right of dower. Tbe other exceptions in tbe record are either immaterial or necessarily abide tbe result of tbis one question.

In questions relating to dower tbe widow is not to be considered a creditor or purchaser for value. Pridgen v. Pridgen, ante, 102; Haire v. Haire, 141 N. C., 88; Norwood v. Marrow, 20 N. C., 578. Marriage constitutes a valuable consideration for many purposes, but not with respect to…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Collins v. Davis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  3. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Rodman v. Robinson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Austin v. . StatenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Speed v. . PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Cummings v. SchreurMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Gay v. J. Exum & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Etheridge v. EtheridgeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Higdon v. . HigdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API