Cole v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Chief Justice Dietzman
■ — Affirming.
Appellant was indicted for the offense of knowingly receiving stolen property of the value greater than $20, and sentenced to serve one year in the penitentiary. He appeals.
As grounds for reversal, he first contends that his demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained because it fails to allege in the accusative part that he “knowingly” received the property alleged to have been stolen. Appellant is in error as to this, for the accusative part specifically states that he unlawfully and feloniously received stolen property of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Grady v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Solomon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blusinsky v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
- Hopper v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Caudill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Duke v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- Gray v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.