Legal Opinion
England v. Moore Equipment Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 24, 1950No. 6174PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLemmon, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above).
The validity of the mortgage in controversy has not been attacked up to the time the property, the subject of the mortgage, was removed from San Joaquin County to Stanislaus County. The mortgage appears to have conformed to the law and was a valid and subsisting lien upon the personal property up to that time. At the time the mortgage was executed and recorded the property was located in San Joaquin County. It was later moved to Stanislaus County and remained there more than 30 days, following which the property was taken by the mortgagee on April 8, 1948…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gates v. SalmonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Ruggles v. CannedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- French v. TeschemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Noyes v. Bank of ItalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Hopper v. KeysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- H. W. Glessner, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Marvin K. Dunagan, Bankrupt v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Frank J. Ferreira v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United California Bank, a California Corporation v. John M. England, as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Felden Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- C. A. Chapman v. John O. England, Trustee of the Estate of Wilson Dore, BankruptCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Brown v. American Trust Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.