Legal Opinion

Kulberg Finances Inc. v. Spark Trading D.M.C.C.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 18, 2009No. 09 Civ. 00792PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendants Spark Trading, Cairo Three A for Trading, Cairo Three A for Trading S.A.E., and Cairo Three A Import & Export S.A.E. (collectively “Spark” or “Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Rules E(4)(f) and 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to vacate the maritime attachment obtained by plaintiff Kulberg Finances (“Kulberg” or “Plaintiff”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons set forth below, the existence of subject matter jurisdiction has been established, but the attachment is vacated for failure to state a valid maritime…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. James N. Kirby, Pty Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Transatlantic Marine Claims Agency, Inc. v. Ace Shipping Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company v. Balfour Maclaine International Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  5. Detroit Trust Co. v. the Thomas BarlumSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Blue Whale Corp. v. Grand China Shipping Development Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  2. Alphamate Commodity GMBH v. CHS EUROPE SACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  3. Al Fatah International Navigation Co. v. Shivsu Canadian Clear Waters Technology (P) Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  4. Buffalo Naval Park Committee Inc. -against- Water Quality Insurance SyndicateDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  5. Victory Shipping Pte. Ltd. v. 50,109 Metric Tons of Cement, in remDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API