Legal Opinion

Gair v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 2008No. 1739 C.D. 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge LEAVITT.

Robert Gair petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying his request for administrative relief from his recommitment as a convicted parole violator. We are asked to consider whether the Board’s calculation of Gair’s maximum date of expiry is supported by the evidence. Concluding that the Board’s computation is not supported by substantial evidence, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

In 2001, Gair was sentenced to serve one year and two months to seven years of imprisonment for the offenses of burglary and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Houser v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Palmer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Pierce v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richards v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Ramos v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. M. Daniels v. PPBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API