Legal Opinion
Ramos v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 4, 2008No. 343 C.D. 2008PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge PELLEGRINI.
Roberto Ramos (Parolee) petitions for review of the order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) denying his request for administrative relief from his recommitment as a convicted parole violator to a state correctional institution to serve 18 months backtime. The issue on appeal is whether the Board proved by substantial evidence that Ramos’ revocation hearing was timely. After review, we conclude that the Board did not meet its burden and, therefore, reverse the order of the Board and dismiss the parole violation charges forming the basis of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Federal Communications Commission v. National Citizens Committee for BroadcastingSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Svetlana Galina and Viatcheslav Galin v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Commonwealth, Department of State v. StecherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Falasco v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Barnes v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Brown v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Fumea v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Lawson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- G.G. Skotnicki v. Insurance DepartmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.