Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Urban Medical Hospital, Inc. v. Seay

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 1986No. 72532Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBeasley, Judge

I concur but must explain the reasons so as not to give the impression that I agree with all that is said. In addition, I dissent with respect to the action ordered by this court as a result of the opinion.

Plaintiff filed a “Motion for Sanctions” which sought three different types of relief: contempt against attorney Downey, with no specific penalty suggested; a monetary penalty against defendant in the form of costs and fees incurred and to be incurred in the lawsuit (and the striking of pleadings, which relief does not figure in the dispute as it comes to us); and disqualification of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dowdy v. PalmourSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  2. Berman v. BermanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Moody v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. West v. FieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Harmon v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API