Legal Opinion

State v. Whitmore

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1985No. 84-950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHastings, J.

The defendant, Randall S. Whitmore, was convicted by a jury of five felony counts involving violations of the Nebraska Uniform Controlled Substances Act (Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 28-401 et seq. (Reissue 1979 & Cum. Supp. 1984)). In his appeal to this court he assigns as error: (1) The admission of evidence obtained by claimed illegal wiretaps; (2) The failure to suppress certain statements made by the defendant; (3) Insufficiency of the evidence to support verdicts of guilty; and (4) Excessiveness of the sentences imposed. We affirm.

The violations were alleged to have occurred on or about November…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. State v. LambNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
  5. State v. KolosseusNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. LenzNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. GibsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State v. WhitmoreNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. State v. SianouthaiNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. HintonNebraska Supreme Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API