Legal Opinion
Zamanov v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 29, 2011No. 19-15910PublishedCited by 158 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLIFTON, Circuit Judge:
Fuad Zamanov petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals adopting and affirming an immigration judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. The IJ found that Zamanov was not credible due to inconsistencies between his testimony before an asylum officer and his subsequent written statements and testimony, which described additional incidents of persecution. Zamanov challenges the adverse credibility determination. We conclude that substantial evidence…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abderrahman Chebchoub v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Satnam Singh-Kaur, AKA Hari Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Rajinder Singh v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by158 opinions
- Gao v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Roberto Silva-Pereira v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Lai v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Latif v. ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Ibrahim Iman v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
153 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.