Legal Opinion
Satnam Singh-Kaur, AKA Hari Singh v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 21, 1999No. 98-70864PublishedCited by 569 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Dissent by Judge HAWKINS.
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
In this immigration case, we are called on to decide whether the adverse credibility findings by the Immigration Judge (IJ) and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) are supported by substantial evidence in the record. We hold that they are and, accordingly, deny the petition.
PROCEDURES BELOW
Petitioner entered the United States without inspection on May 1, 1995. The United States Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) later charged Petitioner with being deportable under former section 241(a)(1)(B) of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-ZacariasSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. StevicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Farid Faham Gamal Ghaly v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Kamla Prasad Meena Kumari Prasad Catherine Sandhya Prasad Micky Sudesh Prasad Ricky Sumit Prasad v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by569 opinions
- Shrestha v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Naseem Salman Al-Harbi v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Chesnel Forgue v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- Jiamu Wang v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Wang He v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
564 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.