Legal Opinion

Doyle v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 30, 2016No. 15-572LPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fifth Amendment Takings, Breach of Contract, Ripe Claims, Statute of Limitations

OPINION

FIRESTONE, Senior Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion filed by defendant the United States (“the government”) to dismiss the above-captioned case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 Plaintiffs James Doyle, a real estate developer doing business as Rocky Mountain Ventures (“RMV”), and his wholly owned limited partnership Environmental…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
  2. Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  3. Letko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
  4. United Water Conservation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API