Doyle v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
Fifth Amendment Takings, Breach of Contract, Ripe Claims, Statute of Limitations
OPINION
FIRESTONE, Senior Judge.
Pending before the court is a motion filed by defendant the United States (“the government”) to dismiss the above-captioned case pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and RCFC 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 Plaintiffs James Doyle, a real estate developer doing business as Rocky Mountain Ventures (“RMV”), and his wholly owned limited partnership Environmental…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Doyle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Letko v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025
- United Water Conservation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023