Legal Opinion
Richardson v. Clayton & Lambert Manufacturing Co.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided May 20, 1986No. EC 84-03-GD-DPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
FACTS
Presently before the court is the third party defendant’s motion for summary judgment on the third party complaint of Clayton & Lambert Manufacturing Company. After due consideration of the voluminous memoranda and exhibits submitted in reference to this motion, the court is of the following opinion:
Clayton Richardson, III instituted the instant action against Clayton & Lambert Manufacturing Company for injuries he received in a swimming pool accident on July 22, 1980. Richardson sued Clayton & Lambert for negligence, breach of express and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- John H. Freeman, Jr., D/B/A Freeman Electric Gin Company v. Continental Gin CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Mitchell v. CraftMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
- Mark Wayne v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Adkinson v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Sheppard Pratt Physicians, PA v. SakwaMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Coats v. Penrod Drilling Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
- Portsmouth Redevelopment & Housing Authority v. BMI Apartments AssociatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1994
- Sheppard & Enoch Pratt Hospital, Inc. v. SakwaMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.