Adkinson v. International Harvester Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Circuit Judge:
This diversity case comes to us on certified interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), from an order denying Harlo Products Corporation’s motion for summary judgment. In this appeal, we are asked one question: Would the Mississippi Supreme Court supplement the state’s commercial code — particularly the provisions dealing with recovery for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability — with principles of contribution and indemnity? Because we conclude that in a case such as this the Mississippi court would supplement its commercial code and apply…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mas v. Two Bridges AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Frazer v. A. F. Munsterman, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Gibson v. ManuelMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Vigortone Ag Products, Inc., Formerly Known as Provimi Acquisition Corporation v. Pm Ag Products, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Adkinson v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Bachtell v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.