Legal Opinion

Adkinson v. International Harvester Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 13, 1992No. 91-1955PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KING, Circuit Judge:

This diversity case comes to us on certified interlocutory appeal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b), from an order denying Harlo Products Corporation’s motion for summary judgment. In this appeal, we are asked one question: Would the Mississippi Supreme Court supplement the state’s commercial code — particularly the provisions dealing with recovery for breach of the implied warranty of merchantability — with principles of contribution and indemnity? Because we conclude that in a case such as this the Mississippi court would supplement its commercial code and apply…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Mas v. Two Bridges AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Frazer v. A. F. Munsterman, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gibson v. ManuelMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hanover Insurance v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  2. Vigortone Ag Products, Inc., Formerly Known as Provimi Acquisition Corporation v. Pm Ag Products, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  3. Whitehead v. Food Max of Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  4. Adkinson v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. Bachtell v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API