Legal Opinion

Norris v. Ross Township

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1916No. 20,371PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Cherokee district court; JAMES N. Dunbar, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

In this action plaintiff sued to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been caused by a defective highway. The court sustained a demurrer to the petition, from which ruling the plaintiff appeals.

The highway in question runs east and west. The petition alleged that for several weeks prior to plaintiff’s injury a culvert in this highway had been allowed to remain out of' repair, so that persons using the highway were obliged to drive around the south end of the culvert, where the ground was about two and one-half feet lower, and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ColumbiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  2. Home Oil & Gas Co. v. DabneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Eberhardt v. Glasgow Mutual Telephone Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Chicago Great Western Railway v. BaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lemos v. MaddenWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  3. Ben M. Hogan & Co. v. KrugSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Smith v. Mead Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  5. Goodaile v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API