Legal Opinion
Canale v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 2017No. 16-CV-3308 (CS)PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
Seibel, J.
Plaintiff Lori Canale brings this putative class action arising out of allegedly misleading labeling on whitening toothpastes sold by Defendant Colgate-Palmolive Co. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss or stay the case. (Doc. 26.) For the reasons stated below, ' the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
*316I. BACKGROUND
Defendant sells Colgate Optic White1 and Colgate Optic White Platinum2 toothpastes (together the “Optic White products”) at a premium price to “capitalize on consumer demand for whitening toothpaste.” (Compl. ¶¶ 1, 2.) Since October…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Colella v. Atkins Nutritionals, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- Abbott v. Beech-Nut CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
- Aguirre v. Hello Products, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Alexandre v. Alcon Laboratories, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2024
- Andrews v. Beech-Nut Nutrition CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2023
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.