Legal Opinion
Villareal v. Ethel S.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 12, 1985No. A030340PublishedCited by 14 opinions
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELKINGTON, J.
Ethel S.,mother of Candy S., a minor, appeals from orders of the juvenile court, dated December 12 and 17, 1984, declaring, among other things, that Candy was a ward of the juvenile court.
*
Ms. S.’s second and remaining appellate contention is that: “The court has failed to examine the present circumstances as required in a 232 proceeding.”
It will be remembered that the juvenile court’s order stated: “The matter is referred to the State Department of Social Services for the initiation of a [Civil Code section] 232 action.”
We are of the opinion that no appeal lies from such…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simac Design, Inc. v. AlciatiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Winter v. GnaizdaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Kunza v. GaskellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Matthew C.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Santa Clara Department of Social Services v. Cecilia M.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re Joshua S.California Court of Appeal · 1986
- Department of Social Services v. V.M.California Court of Appeal · 1988
- County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services v. Gideon J.California Court of Appeal · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.