Marsico v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DOYLE, Judge.
Mary E. Marsico (Claimant) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s denial of compensation for a psychiatric disability under Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act). 1
The issue, as presented by Claimant, is whether the facts as found by the referee established that Claimant had met her burden of proving that she was subjected to abnormal working conditions. The referee found the following facts:
1. Claimant was employed by the defendant, Pennsylvania Department of Revenue as a Clerk II at an average…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- City of Scranton v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Pate v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
3Cited by18 opinions
- 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 801, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,370 Judith S. Dici v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement Frank H. Monaco Steven B. BrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Jeanes Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Dici v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Calabris v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.