Legal Opinion

Marsico v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1991No. 1092 C.D. 1989PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

Mary E. Marsico (Claimant) appeals an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s denial of compensation for a psychiatric disability under Section 301(c) of The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act (Act). 1

The issue, as presented by Claimant, is whether the facts as found by the referee established that Claimant had met her burden of proving that she was subjected to abnormal working conditions. The referee found the following facts:

1. Claimant was employed by the defendant, Pennsylvania Department of Revenue as a Clerk II at an average…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Ketchum, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Thomas v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Hirschberg v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. City of Scranton v. City of ScrantonCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Pate v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. 71 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 801, 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,370 Judith S. Dici v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania State Police Bureau of Liquor Control Enforcement Frank H. Monaco Steven B. BrisonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  2. Jeanes Hospital v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Antus v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Dici v. PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. Calabris v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API