State v. Lee
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHITTINGTON, Justice.
The State appeals the trial court’s order sustaining appellee’s double jeopardy claim and dismissing the indictment against him with prejudice. See Tex.Code CRiM. PROC. ANN. art. 44.01(a)(1), (4) (Vernon Supp.1998). In three points of error, the State contends the trial judge erred in (1) sustaining appel-lee’s objection to a portion of the prosecutor’s opening statement, (2) granting a mistrial based on the prosecutor’s opening statement, and (3) barring a retrial of the charges against appellee based on double jeopardy. For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rezac v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Bauder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Hardie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Rezac v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Ex Parte May, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- State v. LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Ex Parte LewisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- Lewis, Ex Parte Swanda MarieCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.