Hardie v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
MALONEY, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of driving while intoxicated. Tex.Rev.Civ. Stat.Ann. art. 6701/-1. The trial court assessed punishment at 180 days confinement in the county jail, probated for two years, and a $150.00 fine. The court of appeals reversed the conviction, holding that the trial court erred in admitting the audio portion of the videotape wherein appellant invoked his right to counsel. Hardie v. State, 787 S.W.2d 89 (Tex.App.—Dallas 1990). We granted review to determine the correctness of this holding in light of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Rezac v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Zillender v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Griffith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Dumas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
- Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1995
- State v. WarledoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
- State v. LeeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.