Legal Opinion
Nodleman v. Aero Mexico
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 10, 1981No. CV 79-3909-WMBPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S CITY OF LOS ANGELES MOTION TO DISMISS
WM. MATTHEW BYRNE, Jr., District Judge.
This action arises out of the refusal by a foreign airline to carry handicapped persons from Los Angeles International Airport (“LAX”) to Mexico. Plaintiffs Alvin Nodleman, Matty Nodleman and Nathan Stockhammer allege five causes of action: first, that the airline, defendant Aero Mexico, a Mexican corporation, has deprived plaintiffs of rights guaranteed them by Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“the Act”), and Section 404(b) of the…
2Cases cited94 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- B. Doe, M.D., on Behalf of B. Doe and B. Doe's Patients v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Innovative Health Systems, Inc. v. City of White PlainsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Innovative Health Systems, Inc. v. City of White PlainsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Saldivar v. CadenaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1985
- Innovative Health Systems, Inc. v. City Of White PlainsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.