Legal Opinion

Vose v. Müller

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1896No. 6556PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the district court of Cedar county. Tried below before Norris, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNor val, J.

This is a suit in replevin to secure possession of “one red heifer, with scar oh right hip, said heifer being about two and one-half years old.” Before the final submission of the cause in the court below plaintiff filed a written dismissal, and the defendant having established that the heifer at the commencement of the action was of the value of $26, a finding to that effect was entered by the court,- and that the defendant was entitled to a return of the animal; and a judgment was rendered in his favor in the alternative for such return or her value as aforesaid. Plaintiff has removed the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. C. Aultman & Co. v. ReamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Garber v. Palmer, Blanchard & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Moore v. HerronNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Ahlman v. Meyer & SchurmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crump v. BranningSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Millard Gutter Co. v. American Family Ins. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Standard Finance Corp. v. BrelandMississippi Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Rice v. McGrathNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Bankers' Commercial Security Co. v. District Court of Box Elder CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API