Legal Opinion

Gunnels v. Glenn Machine Works, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1989No. 88-117PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALMON, Justice.

This ease involves the loaned servant doctrine as it relates to the exclusivity provisions of the workers’ compensation act.

Tony Gunnels and his wife, Selena, brought an action against F & G Oil Field Services (“F & G”), Glenn Machine Works (“Glenn”), Texas West Oil and Gas Corporation (“TXO”), John Gibson, and James Hall, alleging negligence. The Gunnelses voluntarily dismissed F & G, TXO, and Gibson. The trial court entered a summary judgment for Glenn and Hall.

F & G contracted with TXO to install four storage tanks at one of TXO’s oil fields. Glenn agreed with TXO to supply…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Steel Corp. v. MathewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Ward v. Rhodes, Hammonds, and Beck, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  3. Car Center, Inc. v. HOME INDEM. CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Coleman v. STEEL CITY CRANE RENTALSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Dumas v. Dumas Bros. Manufacturing Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Proctor v. Fluor Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Chandler v. Hospital Authority of City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  3. Towner v. Hosea O. Weaver & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API