Legal Opinion
Morgan v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided May 31, 1983No. 10371-7-IPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.
Plaintiff Gene Morgan appeals a trial court judgment which found defendant Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., not liable for payment for 27 acres of Morgan's peas. The sole issue is whether the trial court erred when it admitted evidence extrinsic to the written contract.
In 1976, Gene Morgan, a Skagit County farmer, entered into a written contract (Morgan-Stokely contract) with Stokely-Van Camp, Inc., whereby Stokely agreed to purchase 336 acres of peas being grown by Morgan. The Morgan-Stokely contract was a form contract with a yearly "rider" attached specifying the variety of peas, acreage per…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stender v. Twin City Foods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
- Black v. Evergreen Land Developers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Barber v. RochesterWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Fleetham v. SchneeklothWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Enterprise Timber, Inc. v. Washington Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Spradlin Rock Products, Inc. v. Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Diamond "B" Constructors, Inc. v. Granite Falls School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- SPRADLIN ROCK v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc. v. National Hockey LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Emrich v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.