Legal Opinion

Stary v. DeBord

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1998No. 97-0802PublishedCited by 469 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

Courts of appeals have jurisdiction over trial courts’ interlocutory orders certifying or refusing to certify a class under Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 42. See Tex. Civ. Peag. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014(a)(3). Stary insists that this grant of jurisdiction does not extend to interlocutory orders striking corporate shareholder derivative claims. We agree. Because the court of appeals erroneously held that it had jurisdiction over an interlocutory order striking a shareholder derivative claim and reached the merits of the appeal, 951 S.W.2d 127, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Eye Site, Inc. v. BlackburnTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In re R.J.J.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. DeBord v. Circle Y of Yoakum, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  5. Ford v. Bimbo CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

4Cited by469 opinions

  1. Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Qwest Communications Corp. v. AT & T CORP.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  5. Cotten v. Weatherford Bancshares, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006

464 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API