Legal Opinion

Dewey v. Parke, Davis & Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Reilly, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Alexander Dewey was a carpenter, and was in the employment of the defendant corporation, which was engaged in a business that in one of its departments required the services of carpenters, and from three to six were kept *632in employment all the time. One Wetzel was superintendent of defendant corporation, and one William Lodge was the foreman over the'earpenter department. If a carpenter was needed, Lodge reported to Wetzel, and he would authorize Lodge to employ him. Lodge had authority to discharge carpenters in his discretion. When carpenter work was to be done in his department, Lodge would…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hoar v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Forbes v. DunnavantSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  2. Combs v. Rountree Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Porth v. Cadillac Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Modlagl v. Kaysing Iron & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API