Legal Opinion

Modlagl v. Kaysing Iron & Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1913PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. George G. Hitchcock, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtWoodson, J.

The plaintiff instituted this suit in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis, against the defendant to recover $15,000 damages for personal injuries sustained by him through the alleged negligence of the latter.

A trial was had before the court and a jury, which resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendant, and in proper time and due form the plaintiff appealed the cause to this court.

The petition was as follows (formal parts omitted) :

“Plaintiff states that the defendant is and was at the times hereinafter mentioned a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marsh v. . ChickeringNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Cregan v. . MarstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Cahill v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Johnson v. Boston Tow-Boat Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  5. Beesley v. F. W. Wheeler & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. White v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Crader v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Vannest v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Pippin v. Will F. Plummer Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Rogers v. Hammond Packing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API