Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Passman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 11, 1976No. 21156PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Justice.

I do not agree that new rule 21c of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure requires a showing of “reasonable diligence” for extension of the time for filing the record on appeal. The rule requires rather a “reasonable explanation” for failure to file it within the time prescribed. In my view, “reasonable explanation” permits a showing that such failure resulted from inadvertence, mistake, or mischance. This interpretation would tend to avoid the harsh result of loss of the right to appeal because of an error of appellant’s counsel or his secretary.

Decisions under old rule 386,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Craddock v. Sunshine Bus Lines, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Patterson v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Thompson v. CARTER, JONES, MAGEE, RUDBERG, MOSS & M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1974

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Kastner Farms, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In the Interest of B.G.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. Heritage Life Insurance Co. v. Heritage Group Holding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Kidd v. Paxton, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1999
  5. Dimotsis v. Lloyds, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API