Legal Opinion

Higgins v. General Motors Corp.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 26, 1971No. 5-5398PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

This is a tort action for damages allegedly resulting from a defectively manufactured brake hose. In September 1964, appellant purchased a 1965 Pontiac Catalina from appellee Horace Terry Pontiac Company (doing business at that time as Milner-Terry Pontiac Company). Almost four years and some 16,000 miles later, the Catalina’s front brake hose ruptured, thus rendering the hydraulic braking system ineffective and allegedly causing appellant to ram into the rear of another vehicle. In April 1969, or about ten months after the accident, appellant received a recall letter from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. Jakubowski v. Minnesota Mining and ManufacturingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. Delta Oxygen Co. v. ScottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
  5. Young v. DodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Mays v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  2. Carey v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Blagg v. Fred Hunt Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Manieri v. VOLKSWAGENWERK AGNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Harrell Motors, Inc. v. FlanerySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API