Legal Opinion

Fields v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 1997No. 93-CF-492, 93-CF-522, 96-CO-738PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEADMAN, Associate Judge.

Appellant Maurice L. Fields was convicted of multiple offenses arising out of two armed carjackings that occurred in February 1991. A photo array introduced as an exhibit was stored at the back of the courtroom during the overnight period following the first day of jury deliberations. The next day the photo array was gone. Fields contends that his due process right to a fair trial was violated by this loss of the photo array. We reject this argument, as well as all the other more conventional issues raised before us, and affirm.

I

A. The February 18 Incident

On February…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Abbott v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Ready v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Parker v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Moctar v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Black v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Strozier v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Harkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API