Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1989No. CR-87-0169-PR, CR-87-0301-PRPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Holohan, Justice

(Retired).

We granted review in these two cases to determine whether a prior conviction, which was not challenged in the trial court, should be afforded a presumption of regularity for purposes of sentence enhancement.

Each of the defendants entered into a plea agreement to plead guilty to specific felony offenses with a prior felony conviction. In the case of defendant Anderson the prior conviction occurred on February 8, 1980, in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, California, in cause No. A-356440 for possession of checks with intent to defraud, a felony. In McGowan’s case the prior…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. State v. MoranArizona Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. CarverArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  3. State v. GeorgeoffArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. State v. JimenezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. State v. WatchmanNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API