Legal Opinion

General Seat & Back Mfg. Co. v. Bergen & Sons, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 24, 1955No. 35334PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

Since the sufficiency of the petition in law may not be questioned by a motion for new trial (Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872 (6), 43 S. E. 280), the only question now raised is whether or not there was evidence to support the allegations of the defendant’s negligence. “Where the plaintiff relies upon more than one act of negligence, it is not necessary that he establish all the acts relied upon, in order to be able to recover. Brooks v. Atlanta, 1 Ga. App. 678 (57 S. E. 1081); Cavanaugh v. Biggin, 9 Ga. App. 466 (71 S. E. 779).” Collier v. Pollard, 60 Ga. App. 105, 109 (2 S. E. 2d 821). It may…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Collier v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Brooks v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  4. Cavanaugh v. BigginCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Imperial Foods Supply, Inc. v. PurvisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. Edenfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API