Legal Opinion

Edenfield v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1957No. 36504PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarlisle, J.

1. It is not the object of a motion for new trial to call in question the legal sufficiency of the pleadings of the plaintiff or the sufficiency of an indictment (Kelly v. Strouse, 116 Ga. 872, 874 (6), 43 S. E. 280; General Seat &c. Co. v. Bergen & Sons, 91 Ga. App. 431, 432, 85 S. E. 2d 778); and where in the bill of exceptions no error is specifically assigned upon the overruling of a demurrer to an indictment, there is no question presented to this court for determination of that matter even though error be assigned upon such ruling in one of the special grounds of the motion for new…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Chambers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  3. Jennings v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  4. General Seat & Back Mfg. Co. v. Bergen & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lovett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  2. Willis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API