Legal Opinion
Hailey v. Cunningham
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided July 18, 1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice.
In this non-jury action the lessee of a commercial building sought reimbursement from two subsequent sets of assignees of the lease for the amount of judgment, interest and attorneys’ fees which the lessee had been required to pay to the lessors. The trial court allowed recovery, and the assignees appealed. They presented numerous issues, all of which were overruled by the Court of Appeals with the exception of the question of mitigation of damages. The Court of Appeals found insufficient evidence that the lessors had reasonably mitigated their damages after…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Southern Fire & Casualty Co. v. NorrisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
- Dale v. Thomas H. Temple Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- International Correspondence School, Inc. v. CrabtreeTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
- Edenfield v. Woodlawn Manor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970
- First American National Bank v. Chicken System of America, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. Blount CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2006
- Quarles v. ShoemakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- Amberjack Ltd., Inc., D/B/A Nonconnah Corporate Center v. Fred Thompson, Individually, and D/B/A Thompson Quality Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
- Bellevue Properties, LLC. v. United Retail IncorporateCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
- Huey v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.