Legal Opinion

Lee v. Welborne

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1888No. 2511PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Upshur. Tried below before the Hon. F. J. McCord. The opinion sufficiently states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, Associate Justice.

September 13, 1886, Lee, a constable, having an execution against Welborne for one hundred and ninety-seven dollars and ninety cents, under express orders from Barnwell, the plaintiff in execution levied upon a grist mill, gin stand, shafting and belting, twenty acres of new-ground cotton cultivated by Welborne, and upon his interest in all his tenants’ crops upon about forty acres by them cultivated. Within less than a week from the levy the twenty acres crop was released. The constable sold the property, realizing upon the mill, gin and fixtures, ninety-three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bowles v. BriceTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Alexander v. HoltTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Galveston, H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. DelahuntyTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Gaston & Thomas v. DashiellTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Dotson v. MossTexas Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chapman v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Gulf Production Co. v. Continental Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Birdwell v. BurlesonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Seay v. FennellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Powers v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API