Legal Opinion

Bowles v. Brice

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1886No. Case No. 2092PublishedCited by 45 opinions

Appeal from Navarro. Tried below before the Hon. L. D. Bradley.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

This was an action of trespass to try title brought on by J. P. Bowles, the husband of appellant, against appellee. There was a verdict and judgment for defendants in the court below. It is conceded here, that appellants showed title to the land upon the trial, and was' entitled to recover, unless appellees W. *726T. Brice and B. L. Brice, had acquired title by the statute of limitations, either of five or ten years.

Appellees’ chain of title was as follows :

1. A deed from P. M. Beal, by attorney in fact, to Z. P. Mize, dated April 3, 1872.

2. Deed by the sheriff of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Medlin v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Cunningham v. FrandtzenTexas Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Texas Land Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Acklin v. PaschalTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Galveston, H. & S. A. R. R. Co. v. DelahuntyTexas Supreme Court · 1880

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Fant v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Hanks v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  3. Link v. PageTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Hussey v. MoserTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Smith v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API