Legal Opinion

Pacific Employers Insurance Co. v. Carpenter

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 12, 1935No. Civ. 9875PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Petitioner is an insurance corporation qualified under the laws of this state to engage in the business of accident and health insurance. In 1931, it obtained approval by the insurance commissioner of one of its policy forms designated as MSP-2. (See Stats. 1917, p. 957.) In 1934, it sought approval of its form designated as MSP-5. It is agreed that, with certain additions, this last-mentioned form was substantially the same as the form previously approved. The question of the legality of these forms was then raised and‘was decided by the insurance commissioner adversely to petitioner. Form…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hannon v. . Siegel-Cooper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. French v. SenateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. Merchants Protective Corp.California Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam.California Supreme Court · 1932
  5. In Re Disbarment of George H. OtternessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. California Physicians' Service v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Gafcon, Inc. v. Ponsor & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Blank v. Palo Alto-Stanford Hospital CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. United States v. American Medical Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. People Ex Rel. State Board of Medical Examiners v. Pacific Health Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API