Legal Opinion

Robert C. Rhodes v. Louis D. Laurino, Queens County Surrogate, and Dorothy M. Dooley, Director, Adoption Department, New York Foundling Hospital

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 22, 1979No. 199, Docket 78-7243PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal, pro se, is from a judgment denying a declaration of unconstitutionality of Section 114 of the New York Domestic Relations Law 1 on its face and as applied. Appellant is an adult adoptee seeking to obtain the medical history of his natural parents and their forebears. Judgment dismissing his complaint was granted by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Mark A. Costan-tino, Judge. Rhodes v. Laurino, 444 F.Supp. 170 (E.D.N.Y.1978). We have upheld the statute against a broadbased attack on its facial validity in Alma Society v. Mellon, 601 F.2d 1225,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Kusper v. PontikesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Justices of the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, in Re Colegio De Abogados De Puerto Rico, and Fundacion Colegio De AbogadosCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  2. Bergstrom v. BergstromCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. Fern v. TurmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Anne Arundel County v. EbersbergerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Alma Society Inc. v. MellonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API