Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Capco Sportswear, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 5, 1997No. A97A0272PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

Capeo Sportswear, Inc. brought suit against Amalgamated T-Shirts d/b/a T-Shirt Inn to recover $62,444.39 for merchandise purchased on account. Capeo also sought a recovery against Stuart Cohen, as the guarantor of Amalgamated’s account. Amalgamated answered and admitted owing a debt on account to Capeo but did not admit it owed the amount alleged and did not specify the amount owed. Cohen denied personally guaranteeing Amalgamated’s debt. The trial court dismissed Amalgamated’s answer for failing to specify the amount owed as required by OCGA § 9-10-112. Capeo then moved for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kramer v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Yancey Brothers Company v. Sure Quality Framing Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  3. Vick v. MercerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  2. John Deere Co. v. HaralsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  3. Rodriguez v. MirandaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Brevard, Inc. v. Broadwater Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  5. Capital Color Printing, Inc. v. AhernCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API