Legal Opinion

Davenport v. Big Tom Breeder Farms, Inc.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1963No. 9275PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McQUADE, Justice.

Jack Davenport, claimant herein, brought this proceeding to recover benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, contending that he is totally and permanently disabled from a virus infection, diagnosed as encephalitis, allegedly contracted in the course of his employment with the defendant, Big Tom Breeder Farms, Inc., under such conditions as to constitute an accident arising out of such employment. The respondents, Big Tom Breeder Farms, Inc., as employer, and the State Insurance Fund, as surety, deny liability under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, contending that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Croxen v. WicksIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Flasche v. Bunker Hill CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Darvell v. Wardner Industrial UnionIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Dunn v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Sutton Ex Rel. Sutton v. Brown's Tie & Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gordon v. WestIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sykes v. C. P. Clare & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Dean v. Dravo CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Dawson v. HartwickIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Duerock v. AcarreguiIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API