Croxen v. Wicks
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, Justice.
Marie Croxen, widow of Lelun R. Croxen, deceased, filed a claim before the Industrial Accident Board to recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, claiming that deceased met his death due to an injury “caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.”
Cecil Wicks, employer, and Idaho Compensation Company, his surety, were made defendants. The Industrial Accident Board ruled “that the fatal accident * * * did not arise out of and in the course of decedent’s employment” and held “that the claim for death benefits by the surviving widow,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zeier v. Boise Transfer Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1927
- State v. AuthemanIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Gallet v. Clearwater Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1929
- Reed v. Bliss & Van Auken Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Smith v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Kiger v. Idaho CorporationIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- Eriksen v. Nez Perce CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Jaynes v. Potlatch Forests, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1954
- White v. PonozzoIdaho Supreme Court · 1955
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.