Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. Tieken
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
HASTINGS, Circuit Judge.
The sole question presented by the Government’s motion to strike certain portions of the complaint in this case is whether this court can and/or should take evidence to test plaintiffs’ assertion that there is no rational basis in fact for the act of Congress prohibiting contracts for the sale of onions for future delivery on or subject to the rules of any board of trade in the United States. See Title 7 U.S.C.A. § 13-1. Basically, it is the Government’s position that the congressional hearings establish a rational basis for the enactment of the law and that this court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Galvan v. PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. TiekenDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959