Legal Opinion

Chicago Mercantile Exchange v. Tieken

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 2, 1959No. Civ. A. 58 C 1690PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFFMAN, District Judge.

This is a class action in which the plaintiffs seek an injunction and a declaration that the Onion Futures Act (hereafter “Act”), 72 Stat. 1013, 7 U.S.C.A. § 13-1, is unconstitutional. The Act provides in relevant part that:

“ * * * no contract for the sale of onions for future delivery shall be made on or subject to the rules of any board of trade in the United States.”

Violation of the Act is a misdemeanor, and the maximum penalty is a fine of $5,000.

The plaintiff Exchange is a board of trade within the meaning of the Act. 'The other plaintiffs are connected with •the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chapman Ex Rel. Chapman v. GerardDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1970
  2. Salomon Forex Inc. v. TauberDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API