Sohon v. Rubin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
The final judgment is erroneous in several respects. (1) The recovery against defendant Chesnin & Leis, Inc., is not warranted by the evidence. (2) The transactions referred to in the second decretal paragraph of the final judgment were no part of the joint venture. Hence plaintiffs were not entitled to have defendant Rubin account for the profits realized on the two items, namely, the sale of the oxford fabric to Supreme Kiddy Tots and the manufacture and sale of “shorts”. (3) Defendant Rubin was improperly adjudged to have converted the merchandise inventory of the joint venture in which he…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dalury v. RezinasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918
- Dalury v. . RezinasNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Belanger v. DanaNew York Supreme Court · 1889
- Hollister v. SimonsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Hollister v. . SimonsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- La Fleur v. MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Blattberg v. WeissNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Roberts v. Astoria Medical GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.