Legal Opinion

Menard v. Sass

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 20, 1985No. 84-2321PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

We are asked to construe ab initio a standard provision in a real estate broker's contract concerning moneys due broker if the buyer defaults. There is no question but that the broker produced a ready, willing and able buyer. Under Wisconsin law, he is entitled to a full commission. We hold that the provision in the standard listing agreement, in which broker agrees to take less, is operable only in a narrow instance. Since that instance did not occur here, broker is entitled to a full commission. We reverse the trial court's ruling to the contrary.

The language at issue is found in a standard…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Zweck v. D P Way Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Zimmermann v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Krause v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. Kreinz v. NDII Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  3. Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API