Menard v. Sass
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.
We are asked to construe ab initio a standard provision in a real estate broker's contract concerning moneys due broker if the buyer defaults. There is no question but that the broker produced a ready, willing and able buyer. Under Wisconsin law, he is entitled to a full commission. We hold that the provision in the standard listing agreement, in which broker agrees to take less, is operable only in a narrow instance. Since that instance did not occur here, broker is entitled to a full commission. We reverse the trial court's ruling to the contrary.
The language at issue is found in a standard…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dykstra v. Arthur G. McKee & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- Zweck v. D P Way Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Martinson v. Brooks Equipment Leasing, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Mansfield v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Zimmermann v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Krause v. Massachusetts Bay Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- Kreinz v. NDII Securities Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
- Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Amjad T. Tufail v. Midwest Hospitality, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013