Legal Opinion

Scott v. Hardyman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1928No. 6 Div. 22PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSTER. J.

This is a statutory bill to quiet the title-and to require respondent to set forth her title to the west 20 acres in the S.W.% of' S.E.%, section 9, township 19, range 5. The respondent filed an answer and cross-bill. The answer denies that complainant owns the land in question. The cross-bill alleges that complainant and ■ her husband deeded the land along with the east •20 acres in said 40 to Pinkney Scott on March 15, 1923, and he deeded it to respondent, his daughter, and that complainant is wrongfully withholding the land from her; that her title be declared, and complainant be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McQueen v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  2. Hutcheson v. BibbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  3. Jones v. BrooksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  4. Kidd v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  5. Yarbrough v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  2. Hinson v. ByrdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Howell Petroleum Corp. v. Berkowitz, Lefkovits & Patrick (In Re Warrior Drilling & Engineering Co.)District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1981
  4. Roberts v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Kelly v. TatumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API