Legal Opinion
Kelly v. Tatum
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided March 5, 1931No. 3 Div. 924, 924-aPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
The bill on behalf of William and Augustus Tatum against appellant Mrs. Kelly is based upon the theory of a resulting trust in the nature of an equitable mortgage on the authority Of our cases, among others, of Montgomery v. McNutt, 214 Ala. 692, 108 So. 752; Moss v. Winston, 218 Ala. 364, 118 So. 739; Poliak v. Millsap, 219 Ala. 273, 122 So. 16, 65 A. L. R. 110; O’Rear v. O’Rear, 220 Ala. 85, 123 So. 895; O’Rear v. O’Rear, 219 Ala. 419, 122 So. 645; Rudulph v. Burgin, 219 Ala. 461, 122 So. 432; Snead v. Dooley, 221 Ala. 598, 130 So. 222.
These complainants and respondent Mrs. Kelly were…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Shipman v. FurnissSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
- Fowler v. Alabama Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1910
- Stephenson v. AllisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Gayle v. PenningtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MothershedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Tuscaloosa v. FairSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- MUTUAL BENEFIT HEALTH & A. ASS'N OF OMAHA v. BullardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- Ellis v. WomackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Cochran v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
- Dusenberry v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.