Pratt v. Smart Corp.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUSANO, Judge.
The plaintiff, Brenda Pratt (“Pratt”), filed suit to recover a portion of the payment made by her to the defendant, Smart Corporation (“Smart”), for copies of her medical records. The trial court granted Smart’s motion for summary judgment, concluding that the relevant statute does not permit a “recovery for this plaintiff against this defendant.” Pratt appealed, raising several issues which in essence present the following questions for our review:
1. Does the record contain evidence from which a jury could conclude that a charge by a hospital’s agent, i.e., Smart, of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cowden v. Sovran Bank/Central SouthTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Gonzales v. Alman Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
- In Re Conservatorship of ClaytonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Newton v. CoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Cotton v. Med-Cor Health Information Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Brown v. Tennessee Title Loans, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Richard Faber v. Ciox Health, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Ford v. ChartOne, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ramirez v. Smart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Petty v. Daimler/Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.